"Bringing Clarity, Acuity and Veracity to Vital Issues and Events at Home and Around the Globe"

___

Truth will surface,
like bubbles from the deep!
___

 

"The clear goal of American foreign policy [must be] most of all to advance and protect the cause of world freedom
Reagan.jpg (12979 bytes)
so that some day every man, woman and child on this earth has as a birthright the full blessings of liberty."
Ronald Reagan

 

 


A Glimmer of Hope for Vietnam
Friday, July 7, 2005*

By "The Cantankerous Yank"

HAVING relatives and close friends who lost their country to brutal communist aggressors in Vietnam 31 years ago, and having therefore intimate knowledge of the subsequent suffering of the people of South Vietnam, I have long held as one of my greatest hopes that one day Vietnam will metamorphose into a free nation. It is a hope I have for all peoples – a dream I share with Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush and, I believe, with most Americans. Indeed, I have chosen to dedicate my life to doing all that I can in pursuit of the realization of that dream. But because of a personal connection, my desire to see a free Vietnam is especially keen.


A street scene in Saigon.
Photo by Michael Workman. Source: World66.com

I was pleased, therefore, to read in the July 4 issue of the Washington Times an assessment by Honglien Do and John Carey (emphatically not to be confused with John Kerry!) of the recent changes in the government of Communist Vietnam, changes that they feel may hold some possibility of moving the country in the direction of a more free, open and democratic society.

Honglien Do, like many of my personal acquaintances, fled Communist Vietnam. John Carey is former president of International Defense Consultants, Inc. They wrote that the naming of Nguyen Tan Dung as prime minister of Vietnam, and several other recent appointments including a new chairman of the national assembly and nine new cabinet members, is an encouraging development. They described Nguyen Tan Dung and some of his associates as an economic reformers and hold that “the news of the new leadership gives great promise.”

Although “the Communist Party has a firm grip on politics in Vietnam, this sweeping political change marked a watershed,” they wrote. Since the end of the Vietnam War in 1975, “hard-line communist leadership made that country a backward, repressed, economically depressed failure.” Although recent “more enlightened thinking” has led to improvements in the country’s economy, all media in Vietnam continues to be controlled by the Communist Party “and the people have no say in their leadership,” the article states.

The new leadership is “potentially much more democratically-leaning,” according to the Washington Times article.

The authors ask: “Why should the United States care about the political future of Vietnam? Precisely because, as President Bush has asserted time and again, ‘Democracies rarely wage war on other democracies.’” They also “tend to cherish freedom … and generally enforce human rights.”

There are other signs of hope, according to Do and Carey. “People in Vietnam are restless for change. This spring and summer, petitions demanding more freedom and openness are circulating in the cities.” People are said to be signing the petitions “despite threats from the communist government.”

Let us earnestly hope that Do and Carey are right in their assessment of Vietnam’s new leadership. It would be a wonderful thing to see the new leaders respond to the people’s petitions by actually expanding freedoms and by beginning to give the Vietnamese people a voice in their government. Let us hope that these new leaders do not respond to a rising freedom-and-democracy movement in the country with a Tiananman-type crackdown such as the Chinese Communists did in 1989.

“Some three decades ago, we bravely attempted to secure the peace, freedom and democracy of the Vietnamese people, only to fail,” wrote Do and Carey. “Maybe enough time has passed now to allow a great nation to extend the hand of peace and reconciliation, and to encourage democracy by other than military means in Vietnam.”

I share the writers’ hope. I hope the months and years ahead will justify their optimism. But I must add one thing: The question is not whether enough time has passed to allow the United States to extend a hand of peace and reconciliation and to encourage democracy by non-military means. This great nation has always been willing to do so. The question is whether the Vietnamese leadership is ready to relinquish tyrannical control and extend political as well as economic freedoms to the Vietnamese people.

If the new leaders of Vietnam have the vision and courage to take those steps, and to lead their country into the family of free and democratic nations, what a great thing that would be – for the Vietnamese people, for the region, and for the world. And what an example it would set for neighboring China! Also, what a fitting (if belated) tribute to the 60,000 American soldiers and the nearly two million South Vietnamese soldiers who sacrificed their lives more than three decades ago fighting side by side in the cause of freedom. When freedom does finally come to Vietnam, we will know, at last, that what those brave soldiers were fighting for was indeed a worthy cause and that, ultimately, their sacrifices were not in vain.

*Copyright © 2006 PerspicacityPress.com. This article was originally published in Perspicacity Press, July 2006 print edition.

bluebullet.jpg (698 bytes)   bluebullet.jpg (698 bytes)   bluebullet.jpg (698 bytes)

bluebullet.jpg (698 bytes)   bluebullet.jpg (698 bytes)   bluebullet.jpg (698 bytes)

Home

Special Reports Archives
(chronological)

Point & Counterpoint
Brief news reports and  terse retorts

Mission Statement

Contact Us

 

Copyright © 1999-2007 PerspicacityPress.com
For permission to reproduce any article on this site, click HERE.

 

Excursiopedia.com: Tours Vietnam. Book tours and activities.